Academic literature

Ackerman, F. and L. Heinzerling, Priceless: On Knowing the Price of Everything and the Value of Nothing, New York: The New Press, 2004.

 Ackerman, F., L. Heinzerling and R. Massey, Applying Cost-Benefit to Past Decisions: Was environmental protection ever a good idea?, Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 576161, Georgetown University, August 2004.

 Adler, M.D. and E.A. Posner, Cost-Benefit Analysis: Legal, Economic, and Philosophical Perspectives, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2001.

 Arculus, D., speech to the staff of the Financial Services Authority, 29 June 2005 (available at http://www.fsa.gov.uk/Pages/Library/Communication/Speeches/2005/0705_sda.shtml).

Arrow, K., et al., Benefit-Cost Analysis in Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation: A Statement of Principles, AEI/Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington, D.C., 1996 (available at http://aeibrookings org/publications/books/benefit_cost_analysis.pdf).

Baldwin, R. and C. McCrudden, Regulation and Public Law, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1987.

Boardman, A.E., Cost-benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997.

Boden R., J. Froud, A. Ogus and P. Stubbs, Controlling the Regulators, London: MacMillan Press, 1998.

Bosanquet, N., “Sir Keith’s Reading List”, Political Quarterly, 52(3), pp. 324-341, 1983.

Breyer, S., “Regulation and Deregulation in the United States”, in G. Majone (ed.), De-regulation or Re-regulation? Regulatory Reform in Europe and the United States, London: Pinter Publishers, 1990.

COSAC (Conference of Community and European Affairs Committees of Parliaments of the European Union), Report on developments in European Union procedures and practices relevant to parliamentary scrutiny, 30 April 2004.

Craswell, R., “Passing on the Costs of Legal Rules: Efficiency and Distribution in Buyer-Seller Relationships”, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 43, 1991.

Donev, G., “Methodology for Regulatory Impact Assessment Related to Occupational Safety and Health”, paper presented at the International Seminar on Implementation of Regulatory Impact Assessment: Best Practices in Europe, AUBG, Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria, 8-11 June 2004.

Driesen, D., Is Cost-Benefit Analysis Neutral?, 2 February 2005 (available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=663602).

Everson, M., G. Majone, L. Metcalfe and A. Schout, The Role of Specialised Agencies in Decentralising EU Governance, Report to the Commission, 1999 (available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/governance/areas/group6/index_en.htm).

Friedman, B.D., Regulation in the Reagan-Bush Era: The Eruption of Presidential Influence, Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press, 1995.

Frontier Economics, Wrong Numbers – Difficulties in Estimating the Welfare Gains from Regulation, Bulletin, June 2005.

Gaebler, T., J. Blackman, L. Blessing, R. Bruce, W. Keene and P. Smith, Positive Outcomes: Raising the Bar on Government Reinvention, Burke, VA: Chatelaine Press, 1999.

Gattuso, J.L., What is the Bush Administration’s Record on Regulatory Reform?, testimony before the Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Natural Resources and Regulatory Affairs Committee on Government Reform, US House of Representatives, 17 November 2004 (available at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Regulation/tst111604a.cfm).

Geradin, D., The Development of European Regulatory Agencies: What the EU should Learn from the American Experience, forthcoming on the Columbia Journal of European Law, 2005 (available at http://www.ieje.net/fileadmin/IEJE/Pdf/European_regulatory_agencies.pdf)

Gore, Alfred, From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government that Works Better and Costs Less, Report of the National Performance Review (US Government body), 1993.

Hagerup, B., “Business Impact Assessment – The Danish Model”, paper presented at the Seminar on Regulatory Transparency: The Use of Public Consultation to Improve the Investment Climate, Thessaloniki, Greece, 22-23 November 2002 (available at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/58/39/2410437.pdf).

Hahn, R.W., Regulatory Reform: Assessing the Government’s Numbers, AEIBrookings Center for Regulatory Studies, Working Paper No. 99-06, Washington, D.C., 1999.

Hahn, R.W.,  In Defense of the Economic Analysis of Regulation, American Enterprise Institute, Washington, D.C., 2005.

Hahn, R.W. and R. Litan, An Analysis of the Third Government Report on the Benefits and Costs of Federal Regulation, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington, D.C., 2000.

Hahn, R.W., J. Burnett, Chan Yee-Ho, E. Mader and P. Moyle, “Assessing Regulatory Impact Analysis: The Failure of Agencies to Comply with Executive Order 12866”, Harvard Journal of Law and Policy, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2000.

Hahn, R.W. and Cass R. Sunstein, Regulatory Oversight Takes Exciting New Tack, Working Paper No. 01-25, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington, D.C., 2001.

Hahn, R. and C. Sunstein, “New Executive Order for Improving Federal Regulation? Deeper and Wider Cost-Benefit Analysis”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 150, No. 1489, 2002.

Hahn, R.W. and M.B. Muething, “The Grand Experiment in Regulatory Reporting”, Administrative Law Review, Vol. 55, No. 3, 2003, pp. 607-642.

Hahn, R. and P. Dudley, How well does the Government do cost-benefit analysis?, Working Paper 04-01, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington, D.C., 2004.

Hahn, R.W. and R.E. Litan, “Counting Regulatory Benefits and Costs: Lessons for the U.S. and Europe”, Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2005, pp. 473-508.

Hampton, P., Reducing Administrative Burdens: Effective Inspection and Enforcement, 2004 (available at http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/935/ 64/Hampton_Interim_Report_ 709.pdf).

Harrington, W., “RIA Assessment Methods”, paper prepared for the OECD project on ex post evaluation of regulatory tools and institutions, OECD, Paris, 2004.

Harrington, W. and R.D. Morgenstern, “Evaluating Regulatory Impact Analyses”, paper prepared for the OECD project on ex post evaluation of regulatory tools and institutions, OECD, Paris, 2003.

Hicks, J.R., “The Foundations of Welfare Economics”, Economic Journal, Vol. 49, 1939, pp. 696-712.

Kaldor, N., “Welfare Propositions of Economics and Inter-personal Comparisons of Utility”, Economic Journal, Vol. 49, 1939, pp. 549-552.

Kamensky, J., “The US Reform Experience: The National Performance Review”, paper presented at the Conference on Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspectives, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 6 April 1997 (available from the US Government archive at http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/npr/library/papers/bkgrd/kamensky.html).

Kleinertova, J., “Specifics and Problems of RIA in Transition Economics and How to Overcome Them”, paper presented at the International Seminar on Implementation of Regulatory Impact Assessment: Best Practices in Europe, AUBG, Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria, 8-11 June 2004.

Konvitz, J., “The Institutional Context for Better Regulation”, paper presented at the Conference on Simple is Better: Effective Regulation for a More Competitive Europe, Amsterdam, 7-8 October 2004.

KPMG, The CEO’s Guide to International Business Costs, 2004.

Laffont, J.J. and D. Martimort, The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.

Lane, J.E., New Public Management, London: Routledge, 2000.

Lazer, D., “Regulatory Review: Presidential Control through Selective Communication and Institutionalized Conflict”, 1998 (available at http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/prg/lazer/control.pdf).

Lee, N. and C. Kirkpatrick, A Pilot Study of the Quality of European Commission Extended Impact Assessments, IARC Working Paper Series No. 8, Impact Assessment Research Centre, University of Manchester, 2004 (available at http://idpm.man.ac.uk/iarc/Reports/IARCWP8.DOC.pdf).

Lussis, B., EU Extended Impact Assessment Review, Institut pour un Développement Durable Working Paper, 9 December 2004 (available at http://users.skynet.be/idd/documents/EIDDD/WP01.pdf).

Lutter, R., Economic Analysis of Regulation in the U.S.: What Lessons for the European Commission?, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington, D.C., 2001.

 McGarity, T.O., “Regulatory Analysis and Regulatory Reform”, Texas Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 1243, 1987.

Moe, T., “Regulatory performance and presidential administration”, American Journal of Political Science, 26(2), 1982, pp. 197-224.

Control and feedback in economic regulation: The case of the NLRB”, American Political Science Review, 79, 1985, pp. 1094-1016.

The new economics of organization”, American Journal of Political Science, 1979, pp. 1094-1117.

Morgenstern, R.D., Economic Analyses at EPA: Assessing Regulatory Impact, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C., 1997.

Morrall III, J., “An Assessment of the U.S. Regulatory Impact Assessment Program”, in Regulatory Impact Analysis: Best Practices in the Main OECD Countries, OECD, Paris, 1997.

“Ebbs and Flows in the Quality of Regulatory Analysis”, speech at the Weidenbaum Center Forum on Executive Regulatory Analysis: Surveying the record, making it work, National Press Club, Washington, D.C., 17 December 2001 (available at http://wc.wustl.edu/ExecutiveRegulatoryReviewTranscripts/Morrall.pdf).

Morrison, A., “OMB Interference with Agency Rulemaking: The Wrong Way to Write a Regulation”, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 99, No. 1059, 1986.

Munger, M., Analyzing Policy: Choices, Conflicts and Practices, New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co., 2000.

Munnich, N., The Regulatory Burdens and Administrative Compliance Costs for Companies, survey by the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise, Brussels Office, 2004.

Niskanen, W.A., Bureaucracy and Representative Government, Chicago, IL: Aldine, 2001.

Niskanen, W.A, “The Weak Fourth Leg of Reaganomics”, Wall Street Journal, 30 June 1988.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development), Regulatory Impact Analysis: Best Practice in OECD Countries, Paris, 1997. 

Regulatory Reform in the United States: Government Capacity to Ensure High-Quality Regulation, Paris, 1999.

The OECD Review of Regulatory Reform in the United States, Paris, 1999.

From Red Tape to Smart Tape: Administrative Simplification in OECD Countries, Paris, 2003.

“Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) Inventory”, note by the Secretariat, 29th Session of the OECD Public Governance Committee, International Energy Agency, Paris, 2004.

Regulatory Performance: Ex-Post Evaluation of Regulatory Tools and Institutions, Paris, 2004.

Economic Survey of the United Kingdom, Paris, 2004.

 Modernising Government: The Way Forward, Paris, 2005.

“Designing Independent and Accountable Regulatory Authorities for High-Quality Regulation”, proceedings of the OECD Working Party on Regulatory Management and Reform, London, 10-11 January 2005 (available at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/15/28/35028836.pdf).

Opoku, C. and A. Jordan, “Impact Assessment in the EU: A Global Sustainable Development Perspective”, paper presented at the Berlin Conference on the Human Dimension of Global Environmental Change, 3-4 December 2004 (available at http://www.fu-berlin.de/ffu/akumwelt/bc2004/download/opoku_jordan_f.pdf ).

Osborne, D. and T. Gaebler, Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector, New York, NY: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1992.

Parisi, F. and J. Klick, “Functional Law and Economics: The Search for Value- Neutral Principles of Lawmaking”, Chicago-Kent Law Review, 79, 2004, pp. 431-450.

Parker, R., “Grading the Government”, University of Chicago Law Review, 70, 2003.

Pelkmans, J., S. Labory and G. Majone, “Better EU Regulatory Quality: Assessing Current Initiatives and New Proposals”, in G. Galli and J. Pelkmans (eds), Regulatory Reform and Competitiveness in Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, Vol. 1, 2000.

Pierce, M., Computer-based models in integrated environmental assessment, EEA Technical Report No. 14, European Energy Agency, 1999.

Pildes, R.H. and C.R. Sunstein, “Reinventing the Regulatory State”, University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 62, No. 1, 1995.

Pollitt, C. and G. Bouckaert, Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Posner, E.A., “Controlling Agencies with Cost-benefit Analysis: A Positive Political Theory Perspective”, University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 68, 2001.

“Controlling Agencies with Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Positive Political Theory Perspective”, University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 68, No. 1137, 2001.

Radaelli, C., “The Diffusion of Regulatory Impact Analysis in OECD Countries: Best Practices or Lesson-drawing?”, European Journal of Political Research, 43(5), 2004, pp. 723-747.

“How Context Matters: Regulatory Quality in the European Union”, paper prepared for the Special Issue on Policy Convergence of the Journal of European Public Policy, 2004.

What Does Regulatory Impact Assessment Mean in Europe?, AEIBrookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Working Paper No. 05-02, Washington, D.C., January 2005.

Rajdlova, J., “Impact Assessment in a Country of Reforms – Slovak Experience”, paper presented at the International Seminar on Implementation of Regulatory Impact Assessment: Best Practices in Europe, AUBG, Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria, 8-11 June 2004.

Rodriguez, L., “Constitutional and Statutory Limits for Cost-Benefit Analysis Pursuant to Executive Orders 12291 and 12498”, Environmental Affairs Law Review, Vol. 15, No. 505, 1988.

Staronova, K., “Analysis of the Policy-Making Process in Slovakia”, 2003 (available at http://www.policy.hu/staronova/FinalResearch.pdf).

Sunstein, C.R., The Cost-Benefit State, University of Chicago Law School, John M. Olin Law & Economics, Working Paper No. 39, May 1996.

Sunstein, C., Risk and Reason. Safety, Law and the Environment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Toth, F.L., Participatory integrated assessment methods - An assessment of their usefulness to the European Environmental Agency, EEA Technical Report No. 64, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 2001.

Van Den Bergh, R., “Towards Efficient Self-Regulation in Markets for Professional Services”, 2005 (available at http://www.hertig.ethz.ch/LE_2005_files/Papers).

Vander Beken, T., “Legislative crime proofing - Detection and evaluation of loopholes that offer opportunities for organised crime”, presentation at the first European Congress on developing public/private partnerships to reduce the harm of organised crime, Dublin, 21 November 2003 (available at http://www.ircp.be/uploaded/dublin-21-11-2003.ppt).

Vibert, F., The EU’s New System of Regulatory Impact Assessment – A Scorecard, European Policy Forum, London, 2004.

Weidenbaum, M., Regulatory Process Reform from Ford to Clinton, CATO Institute, 2000 (available at www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/reg20n1a.html).

West, W.F., “The Institutionalization of Regulatory Review: Organizational Stability and Responsive Competence at OIRA”, Presidential Studies Quarterly, No. 1, Center for the Study of the Presidency, 2005.

Woodward, B. and D.S. Broder, “Quayle’s Quest: Curb Rules, Leave ‘No Fingerprints’”, Washington Post, 9 January 1992.

World Bank, Doing Business in 2005: Understanding Regulation, Washington, D.C., September 2004.

Zerbe, Jr., R.O., Y. Bauman and A. Finkle, An Aggregate Measure for Benefit-Cost Analysis, AEI-Brookings Joint Centre for Regulatory Studies, Working Paper 05-13, Washington, D.C., August 2005.

Zerbe, Jr., R.O., “Is Cost-Benefit Analysis Legal? Three Rules”, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 17, 1998, pp. 419-456.

  

EU Materials

BEST, Report of the Business Environment Simplification Task Force, 1998 (available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/enterprise_policy/best).

DEBR (ad hoc group of Directors and Experts on Better Regulation), Report to the Ministers responsible for Public Administration in the EU member states on the progress of the implementation of the Mandelkern Report’s Action Plan on Better Regulation, Athens, 2003.

European Commission, Communication of 6 November 1996, COM(96)559 (Report of the Commission on the SLIM Pilot Project), 1996 (available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/simplification/docs/com1996-559/com1996-559_en.pdf).

European Commission, White Paper on European Governance, COM(2001)727, 25 July 2001.

European Commission, Preparatory Work for the White Paper, 2002, p. 119.

European Commission, Action Plan on Simplifying and improving the regulatory environment (COM(2002) 278), 2002.

European Commission, Better regulation Action Plan, COM(2002)278, 5 June 2002.

European Commission, BIA Final Report, Lessons Learned and the Way Forward, Enterprise Paper No. 9, 2002 (available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/library/enterprise-papers/pdf/enterprise_paper_09_2002.pdf).

European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Towards a Global Partnership for Sustainable Development, COM(2002)82, 12 February 2002.

European Commission, Communication on better monitoring of the application of community law (COM(2002) 725), 2002.

European Commission, Communication on framework for target-based tripartite contracts (COM(2002) 709), 2002.

European Commission, Communication on general principles and minimum standards for consultation (COM(2002)704), 2002.

European Commission, Communication on impact assessment (COM(2002) 276), including internal Guidelines, 2002.

European Commission, Communication on operating framework for the European Regulatory Agencies (COM(2002) 718), 2002.

European Commission, Communication on proposal for a new comitology decision (COM(2002) 719), 2002.

European Commission, Communication on Simplifying and improving the regulatory environment (COM(2002) 278), 2002.

European Commission, Communication on the collection and use of expertise (COM(2002) 713), 2002.

European Commission, Staff Working Paper, Impact Assessment: Next Steps - In

Support of Competitiveness and Sustainable Development, SEC(2004)1377, 2004.

European Commission, Working Document, Who is doing what on Better Regulation at EU Level – Organisation Charts, 1 July 2004 (available at http://www.eipa.nl/Topics/EPMF/documents/EU_Who_is_who_Better_regulation_July_04_sh_update.doc – visited 4August 2005).

European Commission, A Handbook for Impact Assessment in the Commission - How to do an Impact Assessment, 2005.

European Commission, Annual Evaluation Review 2004 – Overview of the Commission’s Findings and Activities, SEC(2005)587, 2005.

European Commission, Better Regulation for Growth and Jobs in the European Union, COM(2005)97, 16 March 2005.

European Commission, Communication to the Spring European Council on “Working together for Growth and Jobs – A New Start for the Lisbon Strategy”, COM(2005)24, 2 February 2005.

European Commission, Enterprise DG, Final Report of the Pilot Project “Ex- Post Evaluation of EC Legislation and its Burden on Business”, 2005.

European Commission, Impact Assessment Guidelines, SEC(2005)971, 15 June 2005.

European Commission, Recommendations for Actions to Member States for Inclusion in their Lisbon Programmes, COM(2005)24, companion document,3 February 2005.

European Commission, Report “Better Lawmaking 2004”, COM(2005)98, 21 March 2005 (“Simplification of the acquis remains a top priority, in particular for the Lisbon strategy”).

European Commission, reports on the SLIM project, 2005 (available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/simplification/index_en.htm#slim).

European Commission, Staff Working Paper, The Economic Costs of Non-Lisbon, SEC(2005)385, 15 March 2005.

European Commission, Staff Working Paper, Annex to the 2005 Communication on Better Regulation for Growth and Jobs in the European Union, Minimising Administrative Costs Imposed by Legislation, Detailed Outline of a Possible EU Net Administrative Cost Model, SEC(2005)175, 16 March 2005.

Commission, Communication on the Outcome of the screening of legislative proposals pending before the legislator, COM(2005)462, 27 September 2005.

European Commission, Communication on Implementing the Community Lisbon programme: A strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment, COM(2005)535, 25 October 2005.

European Parliament, Report on the Commission White Paper on European Governance, A5-0399/2001, adopted by the European Parliament on 29 November 2001, OJ C 153E, 27 June 2002, pp. 314-322.

European Parliament, “Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality”, OJ C310/207, 16 December 2004.

European Parliament, Resolution 2004/A5-0221, 24 March 2004.

High Level Group Chaired by Wim Kok, Facing the Challenge, 2004 (available at http://europa.eu.int/growthandjobs/group/index_en.htm).

Inter-Institutional Agreement on Better Lawmaking, OJ 2003/C 321/01, 23 December 2003.

Irish, Dutch, Luxembourg, UK, Austrian and Finnish Presidencies of the European Union, Joint statement on Advancing Regulatory Reform in Europe, 7 December 2004 (available at http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/95A/52/6presidencies.pdf).

Joint Statement (four presidencies) is available at http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/47C54/jirf_0104.pdf.

 Mandelkern Group, Final Report, 2001 (available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/impact/docs/mandelkern.pdf).

 UK Presidency of the European Union, Prospects for the EU in 2005 – The UK Presidency of the European Union, presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty, June 2005.

 

UK Government Sources

Better Regulation Task Force (BRTF), Good Policy Making: A guide to regulatory impact assessment, London, Cabinet Office, 1999.

Alternatives to State Regulation, 2000 (available at http://www.brtf.gov.uk/docs/pdf/stateregulation.pdf).

Principles of Good Regulation, 2000 (available at http://www.brtf.gov.uk/reports/principlesentry.asp).

 Annual Report 2001/2002, Champions of Better Regulation (available at http://www.brtf.gov.uk/docs/pdf/ar2002.pdf).

Simplifying EU Law, 2004 (available at http://www.brtf.gov.uk/docs/pdf/simplebetter.pdf).

Avoiding Regulatory Creep, October 2004 (available at http://www.brtf.gov.uk/docs/pdf/hiddenmenace.pdf).

 Make it Simple Make it Better – Simplifying EU Law, 2004 (available at

http://www.brtf.gov.uk/docs/pdf/simplebetter.pdf).

 Get Connected – Effective Engagement in the EU, September 2005 (available at http://www.brtf.gov.uk/docs/pdf/getconnected.pdf).

Regulation – Less is More. Reducing Burdens, Improving Outcomes, 2005 (available at http://www.brtf.gov.uk/docs/pdf/lessismore.pdf).

Blair, T. and J. Cunningham, Modernising Government, 1999.

 Cabinet Office, Proposed Amendments to the Deregulation and Contracting Out Act 1994, A Consultation Document, March 1999.

Regulatory Reform: the Government’s Action Plan, 10 December 2003 (available at http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/regulation/documents/regulatory_reform/pdf/rrap2003.pdf).

Press Release, “Cabinet Office kicks-off project to measure and cut red tape on business”, CAB 043/05, 15 September 2005.

 A Bill for Better Regulation: a Consultation Document, 25 July 2005.

Press Notice, Transforming the Regulatory Landscape – Launch of a Consultation on a Bill for Better Regulation, 2005 (available at http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/regulation/news/2005/050720_bill.asp).

House of Commons, White Paper, Lifting the Burden, Cmnd 9751, 1985.

White Paper, Building Business – Not Barriers, Cmnd 9794, 1986.

 Second Special Report of the Deregulation Committee, 2000 (available at http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199900/cmselect/cmdereg/488 48804.htm).

Research Paper No. 04/52, Small Firms: Red Tape, 28 June 2004.

National Audit Office (NAO), Evaluation of Regulatory Impact Assessments Compendium Report 2004-05 (HC 341 Session 2004-2005).

Evaluation of Regulatory Impact Assessments Compendium Report 2003-04 (HC 358 Session 2003-04).

OFCOM, Better Policy Making. Ofcom’s Approach to Impact Assessment, 2005 (available at http://www.ofcom.org.uk/about/accoun/policy_making/guidelines.pdf).

OFT, Guidelines for Competition Assessment – A guide for policymakers completing regulatory impact assessments, OFT355, 2002.

OFGEM, Guidance on Impact Assessment, 2005 (available at http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/temp/ofgem/cache/cmsattach/11688_14805.pdf).

RIU, Better Policy Making: A Guide to Regulatory Impact Assessment (available at http://www.cabinet-office.gov.uk/regulation/docs/europe/pdf/tpguide.pdf).
 

RIU, Better Policy Making: Checklist to Ensure Good Quality European Legislation (available at http://www.cabinet-office.gov.uk/regulation/docs/europe/pdf/euchecklist.pdf).

RIU, Report on Improving UK Handling of European Legislation (available at http://www.cabinet-office.gov.uk/regulation/docs/europe/word/pqagssrep.doc).

RIU, Transposition Guide: How to Implement European Directives Effectively (available at http://www.cabinet-office.gov.uk/regulation/docs/europe/pdf/tpguide.pdf).

UK Cabinet Office, Opportunity for All in a World of Change, White Paper On Enterprise, Skills And Innovation, 2001 (available at http://www.dti.gov.uk/opportunityforall).

 UK Treasury, Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government, 2003 (available at http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/05553/ Green_Book_03.pdf).

Chancellor Launches Better Regulation Action Plan, Press Notice, 24 May 2005.

 

US Government Sources

 Executive Order 11,821 of 27 November 1974 (available at http://www.thecre.com/ombpapers/ExecutiveOrder11821.htm).

 Executive Order 11,949 of 31 December 1976 (available at http://www.thecre.com/ombpapers/ExecutiveOrder11949.htm).

 Executive Order 12,291 of 17 February 1981 (available at http://www.thecre.com/pdf/EO12291.PDF).

 GAO (General Accounting Office), OMB’s Role in the Reviews of Agencies’ Draft Rules and the Transparency of these Reviews, US Government, Washington, D.C., 2003.

OIRA (Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs), Circular D-4, 17 September 2003.

OMB (Office of Management and Budget) (‘Quality of Life Review’), Agency regulations, standards, and guidelines pertaining to environmental quality, consumer protection, and occupational and public health and safety, 5 October 1971 (available at http://www.thecre.com/ombpapers/QualityofLife1.htm).

Draft Report on the Costs and Benefits of Federal Regulations, 2005 (available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/regpolreports_congress.html).

OMB Watch and Public Citizen, Voodoo Accounting: The Toll of President Bush's Regulatory Moratorium, August 1992.

White House, Memorandum on the “Comprehensive Review of Federal Regulatory Programs”, 15 December 1986.

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, Federal Register 58, Washington, D.C.: The White House, 30 September 1993.

Fact Sheet on Reagan’s Initiatives to Reduce Regulatory Burdens, 18 February 1981 (available at http://www.thecre.com/pdf/Reagan_RegainInitiatives.pdf).

 

 

ENBR

European Network for Better Regulation